Dec 27, 2013
Should Alice in Wonderland be required reading for IT professionals? That question seems strange, as most people think of Alice in Wonderland as being just a children’s story, but as it turns out, the author of the book, Lewis Carroll, was a Mathematician, and there is a scene in his children’s story has a lot of relevance for those IT professionals that are evaluating SDN:
Alice: “Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?”
Cheshire Cat: ‘That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.”
Alice: “I don’t much care where.”
Cheshire Cat: “Then it doesn’t matter which way you go.”
Alice: “As long as I get somewhere.”
Cheshire Cat: “Oh, you are sure to do that, if only you walk long enough.”
We Mathematicians have long speculated that the Cheshire Cat’s last comment was Lewis Carroll playfully interjecting the concept of infinity into the story. Independent of that, the preceding dialogue has a message for IT organizations that are analyzing SDN: any analysis of SDN solution architectures and subtending protocols is totally irrelevant until the IT organization identifies which use cases it is hoping to address by implementing SDN.
To highlight why the Alice in Wonderland message is relevant to the analysis of SDN solutions, assume that the use case that an IT organization is attempting to respond to is the need to support the dynamic movement, replication, and allocation of virtual workloads. The IT organization can respond to this use case by implementing network virtualization. Relative to SDN, there are two approaches to implementing network virtualization. One approach is fabric-based and includes a controller, protocols such as OpenFlow, and the ability to manipulate the OpenFlow tables in each network element. The other approach is based on overlay networks, a controller, and protocols such as VXLAN. Part of the appeal of overlay networks is that they are network agnostic. One thing that means is that, at least theoretically, these solutions can run on top of any network.
The situation is quite different if the use case that the IT organization is interested in is something other than supporting the dynamic movement of workloads; e.g., making it easier to implement QoS or enabling applications to dynamically request services from the network. In order to respond to these use cases, IT organizations need to implement an SDN solution that communicates with the individual network elements. IT organizations will not be able to respond to these use cases with an overlay solution because as previously stated, overlay solutions are network agnostic.
As discussed above, knowing the use case or use cases that are of interest enables an IT organization to understand the viability of both fabric-based and overlay-based SDN solution. In addition, knowing the use case(s) of interest also enables an IT organization to do a thorough analysis of SDN solutions. For example, assume that one of the use cases that is of interest to an IT organization is enabling applications to dynamically request the types of services (e.g., QoS, security) that they want from the network. When analyzing SDN solutions, the IT organization should have the vendor explain how the various components of their SDN solution, such as the northbound and the southbound APIs, enable that use case.
A while ago there was a popular book entitled Everything I Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten. I am not suggesting that everything a network organization needs to know about SDN can be found in Alice in Wonderland. What I am suggesting is that, whereas Alice didn’t know where she wanted to end up, a successful analysis of SDN requires that IT organizations have a very clear idea of where they want to end up.
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons
Jim has a broad background in the IT industry. This includes serving as a software engineer, an engineering manager for high-speed data services for a major network service provider, a product manager for network hardware, a network manager at two Fortune 500 companies, and the principal of a consulting organization. In addition, Jim has created software tools for designing customer networks for a major network service provider and directed and performed market research at a major industry analyst firm. Jim’s current interests include both cloud networking and application and service delivery. Jim has a Ph.D. in Mathematics from Boston University.